Real-life reenactment of the Contra Code & No Facebook

I deactivated my Facebook account two days ago because I realized my use of it was resulting in hours of procrastination. For example:

- 1 + hour bus ride to and from UBC each day; instead of reading, I would use Facebook on my phone

- get home from school and spend an hour bumming around on the internet

- 2 hour break between classes?Why… how about I waste time on Facebook and chat with my friends?

So that needed to stop, and I am only so disciplined, so I just deactivated my account altogether.

So far I am enjoying not having Facebook; those three examples of time-wasting did not occur yesterday and I was way more productive.

HOWEVER.  Just because I don’t have Facebook does not mean I am not going to find silly things on the internet and post them on occasion.

 

Like this, a real-life reenactment of the Konami Code (aka Contra Code) which is rather charming.

 

 

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

” More offenders being identified … and more convictions”

As someone who has spent the past five years eating sociology for breakfast, the above quote (from a local news source) caught my attention for a few reasons.  It discusses how the Vancouver Police Department (VPD) has opened a new facility that will improve the efficiency of day-to-day operations. AKA: YAY more people in jail!

The following two sentences are what I found most interesting because of their inferences about the need for better crime control in Vancouver, and the role of the police in this context.

Evidence from high-profile cases such as the Stanley Cup riot is also stored on automated document storage units.

“Being able to secure the evidence and examine it will mean more offenders being identified … and more convictions,” Chief Jim Chu said.

The second sentence is what I’ll focus on first.  Note the “…”

Reading the second sentence gives the reader the impression that there has been a lack of people being convicted of crimes because of a failure to identify them.  Framed within this article, that failure to identify “offenders” (err.. suspects?) can be attributed to inefficient operations within the VPD which are being addressed by the opening of a new, high-tech facility.

But more convictions?  Don’t we all keep reading about how crime rates continue to drop to their lowest since the 1970s?

Crime statistics (which, of course, do have a notoriously contested validity) indeed show that crimes of all types are dropping in Canada.  Disaggregated, Vancouver has also enjoyed a drop in crime .

So what good would MORE convictions serve?

Well, that is open to debate. But to add some context to the above quote:

  •  The Safe Streets and Communities Act has recently been passed in Canada, which is arguably an American-style “get tough on crime” bill that focuses on retribution as the primary solution to crime.  By (among other things) eliminating conditional sentences and increasing the severity of punishment for certain crimes, some critics have argued that this will result in overcrowded prisons as a consequence of a potential increase in arrests and convictions.
  • Does the public actually think that crime is high, meaning tougher crime-fighting is required?  It doesn’t seem like they do , at least according to Statistics Canada’s 2011 edition of Juristat which includes a report on Canadians’ perceptions on crime.  It should be noted that generally, Vancouverites did perceive crime to be a bigger problem than residents of Canadian cities in Eastern Canada.
OK, so people don’t really think that crime is a major problem that affects them directly in Canada, right?
That’s where the first half of the quote at the top of this blog entry becomes a bit more interesting.
The 2011 Stanley Cup Riot in Vancouver was something pretty unusual.  People went apeshit and rioted in the city, setting cars aflame, breaking windows, looting, and taking pictures of it all to share on the Internet (aka a social scientist’s dream event???).
The public was mad and demanded justice, demanded punishment, and engaged in social media-assisted vigilante campaign to help accomplish this  .  It was a  massive, emotional and irrational response.  People were angry.  Vancouverites wanted to find the
people who had engaged violently with their city, and made it an international embarrassment.
So, again, consider the placement of the sentence about the evidence from the riot right before the sentence about identification and conviction…
Source Article:

Metro – VPD opens new $30M state-of-the-art facility.

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

When real life met internet life, my ability to express myself was compromised

I stopped really updating my blog around early 2008, I think. I had just become employed in my first and only full-time 9 -5 job after dropping out of university because I couldn’t afford to go anymore.

Facebook was getting more popular, and non-geeks had become fully integrated into the Internet. It was becoming increasingly difficult to hide an online presence from the offline world, or guarantee that I could write about life and ideas in a way where 1) all my writing would be public, even if anonymous; 2) my current employer or clients and other stakeholders thereof could be guaranteed to never find what I wrote and come to the conclusion that the content was created by me.

That was shitty. I liked to be able to have opinions about things, even if upon reading them later, I thought, “that was angsty” or “how did that logical fallacy occur”, or “I made THAT grammar error”? I’ll probably do the same with this post one day.

But I found that I was continually censoring what I was writing and making old posts private, and then only writing things that I thought were “vanilla” enough that if a boss or whoever happened to see them, they could read the whole damn blog and not be able to figure out anything about me — even if they knew that the blog was written by me.

WELL, THAT RESULTS IN A COMPLETE SUPPRESSION OF….. EVERYTHING, DOESN’T IT?

I have no idea who read this before. I know my twin brother Byron faithfully read this and left thoughtful comments. I know other people read it because they would sometimes tell me that they had read something on my blog, and some people even said they liked it.

That was 4 years ago.

I was an ok writer. At that time, I still thought of myself as a writer in the artistic manner. I had dropped out of school while pursuing an English degree. NOW, I’m finally almost done my degree that I started in 2007. It’s not in English; it’s in Sociology. And I don’t write creatively; I write mechanically. I am not the “creative” person I used to be.

I digress.

I have been unemployed by choice for almost 5 months — I quit my job so that I could finally graduate with the money I had saved up. Slowly I have started to become myself again. I’m not chilled by the thought of someone reading what I have to say the way I was while employed.

It’s a pretty shitty reality, but it IS reality. As a follower of Foucault’s writings about surveillance and the internalization of discipline, I can at least reflect on the shitty reality with some appreciation since it is ever-relevant to some of my research interests. That is worth something, right?

Still, I have become so used to the anxiety of “what if the wrong person reads what i wrote” that I have become less comfortable with talking about certain things in a public forum. Before I was pretty confident about that kind of stuff. That is not the same thing as being an exhibitionist, mind you. I don’t think I was ever really an exhibitionist, but people mistake “talking about taboo/controversial” subjects comfortably as “exhibitionism.”

I would like to think that I still can write creatively, but as mentioned above, it’s all so mechanical.

So we will see.

HELLO INTERNET.

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

In the meantime

Oh hey. I cleared house. All old entries are now gone, and the stuff below is just crap from my barely-used Tumblr that I have imported. I don’t think this blog will be particularly tumblr-y, but it’s now to said seldom-used account, so the occasional stupid picture might pop up.

Stay tuned?

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

I wanted to post a picture of Kermit the Frog on my mom’s Facebook…

I wanted to post a picture of Kermit the Frog on my mom’s Facebook, but Facebook wouldn't let me’

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

I made my friend a cake that looks like nachos for his birthday. 

It met an early demise

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

tomasdelbalso: the real hunt- the hunters have become the hunted

tomasdelbalso: the real hunt- the hunters have become the hunted

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

Party party!

supninja: fuckyeahdementia: Party party!

Uncategorized

Comments (1)

Permalink

(via The Noise Tigers)Friends in Vienna. Their music.

(via The Noise Tigers)Friends in Vienna. Their music.

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

Freestyling in the boudoir

At my house. East Vancouver special.

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

Being too rational about accepting gifts

My mom just came back from Paris and has €60 leftover.  I am going to be in Vienna next month, so she generously offered to mail her remaining money across Canada to me.

While [I think] most people would gladly accept such a gift, I didn’t feel like it was necessarily in my mom’s best interest to send me the money.  Apparently I am wack.  So I wrote to my mom:

“if the value of the amount of time it takes to go to the bank and exchange it + any exchange rate fees exceeds $75.00 + the cost of a stamp, envelope, and card/object to conceal the bills + the value of your time to organize said items and go to the mailbox, then I will rationally and happily accept your generous gift!”

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

Freudian typos?

“Earth’s EATMOSPHERE”.

I am not sure how I managed that one, but I refused to change the mistake.

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink

Large Hamburgers

The Hamburger bed:

Claes Oldenburg’s giant hamburger ([formerly?]on display at the Art Gallery of Ontario)

Don't let this fool you: It's about 4 feet tall.

A hamburgercycle

Or is it a tricycle?

A meal for the whole family

Uncategorized

Comments (0)

Permalink